Ipsilateral Cervicodeltopectoral Flap: A Forgotten Technique, Revival in the Era of Microvascular Reconstruction.

Oral cavity cancer is one of the most common cancers in India responsible for significant morbidity and mortality in Indian subcontinent. Majority of cases present in advanced stages which requires extensive reconstruction following tumor resection. Microvascular free flap reconstruction is now considered standard of care for reconstruction for major head and neck skin-mucosal defects but, many factors still act as hindrance like patient's comorbidities, long operating hours for microvascular reconstruction, logistic and financial issues from patient's side. In such situation it is better to have a backup plan for reconstruction of major head and neck defects using pedicled flaps. Pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap has been the workhorse flap for head and neck reconstruction since its introduction four decades ago. But relying too much on PMMC flap for major skin-mucosal defects especially in female patients is associated with complications and risk for flap failure leading to catastrophic and significant patient morbidities. Our study involves the use of two flaps for head and neck reconstuction involving skin-mucosal defects i.e PMMC flap for mucosal defect and cervicodeltopectoral (CDP) flap for skin defect. As of now there has been no retrospective or prospective study done which has given a conclusive statement regarding use of these two flaps simultaneously for head and neck reconstruction to the best of our knowledge. In our experience from the present study, CDP flap offers an excellent alternative for extensive head and neck reconstruction and can be readily included in the surgeon's armamentarium with proper planning and meticulous handling.

Myoepithelial Carcinoma of Sinonasal Cavity: Peculiar Diagnosis, Conventional Treatment.

Myoepithelial carcinoma is a morphologically diverse tumor which either arises de novo or from the malignant transformation of its benign counterpart i.e. myoepithelioma. These are relatively lesser known entities and are rarely found in head and neck region. Although rare, their first presentation is usually a painless growing mass as seen in our case presentation as well and are infamous for lymph node recurrence and distant metastasis. Due to their clinical presentation and varied morphology these become tedious to diagnose and pose difficulty for a surgeon when presented at a later date due to their effect on the adjacent vital structures. We report a case of myoepithelial carcinoma in head and neck region arising from the nasal cavity, it's mass effect on the adjacent vital organs and the diagnosis and treatment plan to render the patient free of this tumor, preservation of the vision and keeping the recurrence of the tumor at bay.

Recurrent Giant Myofibroblastic Sarcoma of Neck in a Teenager: Overcoming Treatment Challenges.

Sarcomas are rare tumors arising from a variety of mesenchymal tissues which are even rarer in head and neck region amounting 1% only of the 5% of sarcomas. About 80% of head and neck sarcomas originate in soft tissue while the remaining 20% arise from bone (Cormier and Pollock in J Clin 54:94-109, 2004). One among the commonly presenting variants of sarcomas in head and neck that our patient was diagnosed with is Low grade myofibroblastic sarcoma (LGMS). These even though uncommon have a predilection for head and neck region particularly the tongue (Mentzel et al. in Am J Surg Pathol 22:1228-38, 1998; Cai et al. in Virchows Arch 463:827-36, 2013; Meng et al. in Chin Med J 120:363-9, 2007; Demarosi et al. in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 108:248-54, 2009). LGMS was reclassified as a distinct entity by the WHO classification of soft tissue tumors in 2002 (Qiu et al. in Oncol Lett 9:619-25, 2015). Oncological resection is the mainstay of treatment. In case of bulky tumor, resection and reconstruction would be challenging. We report a recurrent LGMS of 15-year-old girl who presented with a ginormous soft tissue swelling in her left neck region which made her day-to-day activities strenuous and made her non ambulatory and the line of treatment executed in order to get her back on feet, healthy & free of the debilitating tumor.

To CT or not to CT: Questioning the Cost-Effectiveness of CT Thorax in Head and Neck Cancers.

Computed tomography (CT) scan has been an integral part of the diagnostic workup for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Our study was designed to find out the incidence of distant metastasis and second primary tumor and to correlate the cost-effectiveness of CT thorax in detecting the same. This study was conducted among 326 cancer patients who visited our center with curative intent in the year 2021, with lesions in various head and neck subsites. Data were collected based on their pathological TNM staging and the presence of distant metastasis as evident on their CT thorax imaging with various variables related to the disease. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated for detecting a single metastatic deposit and second primary tumor in terms of Indian currency and was correlated to each subsite and stage of disease at presentation. Out of these 326 patients, 281 patients were included in our study after considering the inclusion criteria, and among these 281 patients, 235 of them underwent CT thorax for metastatic workup. No patient was found to have a second primary. Metastases were found in 12 patients. The site of primary lesion and clinical tumor (cT) staging were found to be significantly influencing the incidence of metastasis on CT thorax. ICER was least for larynx, pharynx, and paranasal sinuses and was highest for oral cavity primaries and early-stage disease. As per our observations and results of ICER, CT thorax is indeed a valuable modality but should be used judiciously when it comes to initial diagnostic workup.